The case of the US vs Bradley Manning
Why have the US media shied away from covering the source of the WikiLeaks material yet gouged on his information?
Please watch from http://www.youtube.com/watch?US Private Bradley Manning is no longer the alleged source of all those documents to WikiLeaks. According to his own testimony, delivered before a military court on February 28, Manning was the source – nothing alleged about it.Our feature takes us to Ethiopia where the US ‘war on terror’ has provided cover for laws that are being used to silence dissident journalists. Reeyot Alemu is one of those journalists – she has been sentenced to five years in jail. Foreign reporters have also been charged under anti-terrorism laws for daring to communicate with opposition groups. The Listening Post’s Nic Muirhead takes a closer look.
In a pre-trial hearing for the first time, Manning admitted that he broke the law when he released around 700,000 government documents to WikiLeaks but these lesser charges did not satisfy the United States government.
Calling more than 100 witnesses – some anonymously and in closed hearings – prosecutors will argue that Manning’s leak put national security and lives at risk by ‘aiding the enemy’. To read the whole article open the link http://ecadforum.com/2013/03/
Also to watch more about the price of war on terror in Ethiopia please open the you tube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Have a good Sunday,
Regards, Argaw
YouTube - Videos from this email
Click here to Reply or Forward
|
No comments:
Post a Comment